Author Topic: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...  (Read 31573 times)

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #30 on: August 21, 2025, 03:52:54 AM »
The Acceleration of Time paradox may well be a problem of conciousness.




Let me add to the weirdness. I just started watching this vid on YouTube, then I clicked on this page and here it is, as if it was inevitable.  ???

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #31 on: August 21, 2025, 05:05:39 AM »


Let me add to the weirdness. I just started watching this vid on YouTube, then I clicked on this page and here it is, as if it was inevitable.  ???

Playing whack-a-mole in a rabbit hole will do that once in a blue moon.

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #32 on: August 21, 2025, 05:12:12 AM »
Playing whack-a-mole in a rabbit hole will do that once in a blue moon.

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #33 on: August 22, 2025, 10:27:54 AM »
Playing whack-a-mole in a rabbit hole will do that once in a blue moon.

This is the most tepid bullying I've ever seen. Sad? Pathetic!!

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #34 on: August 23, 2025, 12:19:17 AM »
Let me add to the weirdness. I just started watching this vid on YouTube, then I clicked on this page and here it is, as if it was inevitable.  ???

I honestly didn't find anything vaguely mathematical in that particular vidya, at least not in the first five minutes before I stopped watching it...



The above vidya doesn't have anything to do with mathematics either, other than the natural mathematical inherency of muzak.



N'Joy!


Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #35 on: September 06, 2025, 08:33:43 PM »
This issue I have with the so-called "Hubble Tension" and the apparent observational discrepancies theythe hobo elite might be approached by considering magnetic monopoles as the source.

Doc, I know you are following this thread with great difficulty;  I offer to you the following vidya:



Which for some bizarre reason seems to constantly AutoPlay for me if I have that setting enabled on YouTube.  I find it incredibly infuriating, honestly.  I am somewhat skeptical of the idea of "Dark Matter" as it is presented and entirely reject the idea of "Dark Energy" that the logic of "Dark Matter" dictates...

The vidya above was perhaps the ultimate source of my earlier musings on tensors, and the idea of how they might be used to examine the "mean free path of light" in the "vacuum" of deep inter-galaxial space.  If one introduces these predicted magnetic monopoles into said vacuum, might this need for both Dark Matter and Dark Energy entirely disappear?

If the above link to a treatise on magnetic monopoles proves too difficult or lengthy to read (how I wish I had a copy of my dear old father's similar one he constructed for a Master's Thesis, alas) here is a Panhandler Broadcasting System vidya on the same subject:



You may find it a bit difficult to follow, and I apologize in advance for not "using my own words" to describe what, in fact, the actual theorized magnetic monopole might be.

You may think of them as electrons and/or protons, of a fashion;  if you like.   They are NOT electrons/protons per se but do somewhat resemble them.  I believe the main difference betwixt the two is the predicted mass of the monopoles, the vidya does a decent job of outlining this.

It would be curious indeed, should one ever manage to capture and/or create a magnetic monopole, to examine exactly what effect (if any) the presence of one or more might have on the electromagnetic light wave?

I speculate, perhaps these things might be found in greater abundance in these vast intergalactic void spaces.  If they have the predicted masses AND monopolar charge they very well might be distorting the mean free path of light passing through in a significant and perhaps even unexpected manner.

Note that magnetic monopoles of opposite charge would annihilate one another, and if any were still extant in the universe they must necessarily be separated from one another (perhaps in clouds of like charges) separated by some distance.

I further note:  the first vidya linked above does not even bother to adventure into a possible magnetic monopole explanation of the Dark Matter/Dark Energy issue;  I honestly expect more of the esteemable Dr. Kaku...



N'Joy!


 

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2025, 01:01:34 AM »
Note that magnetic monopoles of opposite charge would annihilate one another, and if any were still extant in the universe they must necessarily be separated from one another (perhaps in clouds of like charges) separated by some distance.


Just tell me who I'm supposed to fuck. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #37 on: September 09, 2025, 04:43:06 AM »
The precise moment I clicked onto the following link a green mantid like fly which I have never seen before landed on my left forearm. Like a message from the Mighty Galactic Mantis watchers. On reaching for my camera it flew under a lampshade and was never seen again.

Magnetic Monopole Interaction of Matter and Methods of Detecting

https://www.rexresearch.com/shakhpar/shakhpar.htm

Quote
Taking into account the following experimental data: phenomenon of super permeability, generation of gravitational waves, magnetizing of objects processed by the magnetic monopole beam, considerable penetration capability of the beam, phenomenon of magnetic cooling of mater by its interaction with the beam, we think that the existence of the magnetic monopole may be considered to be a proven fact.

Re: Maths, Mathematics, Calculus, DiffEq &c...
« Reply #38 on: September 21, 2025, 03:30:38 AM »
Old Sabine seems to think some recent J. Webb Telescope findings/observations call the "Standard Model" of physics into question:



You may count me as among the "fringe" that suspects something might be wrong about the Standard model.  I have no basis for this other than I do not like the idea of Dark Energy, a made up quantity of extra energy "from somewhere" that makes the also suspect Dark Matter "work."  They both seem to conjure themselves from nothing, which violates the understood 1st Law of Thermodynamics.

I am willing to allow a Dark Matter that we cannot detect for some reason or another, but I utterly reject the Dark Energy idea.