these claims have been greeted with intense skepticism by clinicians and medical ethicists.
Just so that I'm clear on who these people are... Are these the same medical ethicists who don't even question the ethics of producing vaccines from cell lines (procured from fetuses.) Are they the same group of people who demanded a whole month of trials for a brand new vaccine before telling everybody that the vaccines were safe and should be taken?
Are these the same etheicist who just recently decided that it was ethical to grow a human monkey chimera for a month? Hell, are these the same people who offered to decide if they should discontinue care of my father?*
I'm sorry- but that is a laughable title with shitty people standing behind it. There has never been a decision that they wanted to reach that they could not do the mental gymnastics necessary to reach. Feel free to look up the ethicists who concluded that making a human monkey is just fine.
*I laughed when they offered to make the decision for me and told them that being as I already knew what their conclusion would be (it was ethical) and that it would just be me making the decision by proxy. I kind of berated them for the offer as there should be no way to not have that decision weigh on your conscience (but discontinued care a week or so later after I weighed the options and evidence.)