Biden Minneapolis dindu riots

[Master Trollda]

Woke bullshit the verdict is.

[Asuka Langley]

Woke bullshit the verdict is.

Niggers will burn loot and murder tonight anyways. Tonight's live-streams will still be entertaining and Chauvin will get off on appeal.

[Master Trollda]

Niggers will burn loot and murder tonight anyways. Tonight's live-streams will still be entertaining and Chauvin will get off on appeal.

For sure he will. The jurors must have felt pressured to vote that way after Maxine Waters threatened to burn the city down if they didn’t. Total mistrail.

[Asuka Langley]

For sure he will. The jurors must have felt pressured to vote that way after Maxine Waters threatened to burn the city down if they didn’t. Total mistrail.

Niggers will burn it down anyways so it's still a win in my book. After he goes free on appeal the niggers wont even remember who he was or care LOL.

[Asuka Langley]

And attempts to break the windows

DEY GONNA GET DEY REPARASHUNS! NAWIMSAYIN?

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1384630976739954690

[Asuka Langley]

These niggers got exactly what they wanted and they are still going Ape. This shit is hilarious and has only emboldened these animals to commit more crime because they know they are above the law now LMAO!

[Master Trollda]

[Asuka Langley]

https://twitter.com/myamaileen/status/1384632485254991872

[K_Dubb]

Looking a little chubs there 

[pate]

I have a paper to write for a Philosophy class, I think someone hear might be able to help me with something that has been troubling me for years:

Does anyone know of a concise single sentence definition of the term "Social Justice" that is logically valid?

A year or so ago my friend that happens to be the head of the Political Science department at his university was in town, and I asked him that very question at a symposium.  His response was:  "That is a good question."

I regaled him with my observation that when the phrase is broken down you get "Social" which has Marxist overtones and "Justice" which is apparently a question that is debated from antiquity (Socrates:  "What is just?") to today (Heinlein:  "TANJ").

I can safely say that I am axing for a fiend on this one.

[K_Dubb]

Dear sir, forgive me if you have covered Marx already but he was primarily interested in class distinctions (proletariat, bourgeois, etc.) and not the race, sex, etc. distinctions beloved of today’s social justice warriors.  “Social justice” as currently used does not require the elimination of class distinctions at all (which was Marx’s aim under which the workers are to own the means of production), just that there be no appreciable correlation (as measured in money and opportunity and rights) between race, sex, etc. and status.

As far as I know it would be possible to have a socially just society that is highly stratified in a way that would make Marx tear his already dreadful wiglet.

[Master Trollda]

highly stratified in a way that would make Marx tear his already dreadful wiglet.

[/quote]

[pate]

...As far as I know it would be possible to have a socially just society that is highly stratified in a way that would make Marx tear his already dreadful wiglet.

This is exactly the sort of delicately worded, concise and recursive definition that I was looking for.  Thank you.

As usual your political finesse far exceeds my brutish approach, I never thought to include half of the term as a self-referential definition.  This will muddy the waters (Maxine 2021) aqueously.

"Velvet Fists and Iron Gloves":  that sounds like a wonderful new MAPA initiative!  I leave the deets in your capable hands, Shadow-Veep Dubb.

We really need to look into the situation on Plum futures for Q3-2023 to Q1-2024, your share should not diminish in its inestimable value.

Once again, I congratulate myself on my astute and wise selection of you as running-mate!  Which of course will be Shirtless on Every Other Next Tuesday!



Such a whirlwind of a vic'try, it has seemed effortless...  We are shy some few daze of the hunnert, Nautical Shore?

pate/K_Dubb 2024
"WHO shat in the interregnum?"

[K_Dubb]

Of course, that is why communism is impractical.  Though it is nominally the creation and animal of the proletariat, the state will seek foremost to preserve itself if it is strong enough and, if it is weak, will be unable to prevent the proletariat from splintering.

[pate]

I understand the profound need for my peoples to celebrate my Birthday Week, I just hope that they do not get too Irrationally Exuberant...  I for one look forward to at least another nineteen point five more.

Nautical Shore