Author Topic: Theosophy  (Read 1134 times)

Theosophy
« on: November 29, 2024, 07:42:00 PM »
"Everything in the Universe, throughout all its kingdoms, is conscious: i.e., endowed with a consciousness of its own kind and on its own plane of perception. We men must remember that because we do not perceive any signs — which we can recognize — of consciousness, say, in stones, we have no right to say that no consciousness exists there. There is no such thing as either “dead” or “blind” matter, as there is no “Blind” or “Unconscious” Law."
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume I

The Physical Body is the most material sheath or instrument used by the forces manifesting as the human composite nature. This body is the evolutionary product of the inner man’s experience during vast ages of time in and through all the kingdoms of nature. Thus the reembodying ego, having acquired knowledge of the earth’s manifesting forms and forces, combines or correlates the principles and products of the mineral and vegetal life-atoms in its animal body, while evolving through its human incarnations.

Occult biology also teaches that every monad which now has unfolded itself into the human stage, did at some remote cosmic period pass through all the lower kingdoms of nature as they then existed; even as the monads now finding expression in the elemental, mineral, vegetable, and animal kingdoms are undergoing the same process of evolutionary unfolding from within outwards and therefore are on their way upwards to a state equivalent in characteristic powers to what the human now has reached.

The Human Kingdom is one of the great kingdoms or divisions of monads on earth. Below it are the animal, plant, mineral, and also three elemental kingdoms; above are kingdoms of Dhyanis or highly evolved human beings and gods. One of the critical points in evolution, at which self-consciousness is attained, although by no means fully developed. Here the spiritual and the material meet: the spiritual self finds its house in the organism built up of lower elements, and the two-natured human being of earth is thus formed.

In natural history, a large group, department, or domain, marked off from others by characteristic qualities, three being generally recognized: animal, vegetable, and mineral, with mankind at the summit of the animal kingdom. Ancient thought as a whole, however, took account of vast spheres of cosmic inner space and inner consciousness inhabited by numerous hierarchies of all-various evolving, intelligent, and semi intelligent beings.

Hence it is that mankind was a separate kingdom; and, if we consider human nature as a whole, humanity is more sharply distinguished from the lower kingdoms than they are from each other. To these four in theosophy are added three kingdoms below the mineral called elemental kingdoms, thus making a Septenate.

Above the human may be enumerated three Dhyani-Chohanic or god kingdoms, but the word “man” has often been used so as to include these kingdoms. These divisions correspond to the other Septenary and denary divisions in the cosmos.

The more highly each kingdom is specialized along its peculiar lines, the more sharply is it differentiated from the other kingdoms; but the distinction tends to disappear and merge into a continuity when the entities in the different kingdoms are in an elementary or germinal stage.

The entities in any kingdom higher than the lowest must pass in brief recapitulation through all the stages represented by the preceding kingdoms, before they can develop the features characteristic of their own kingdom. All the seven kingdoms or life-waves are manifestations of different groups or life-waves of monads in various degrees of emanational self-manifestation.

"The universe is founded in consciousness and guided by it. The final reality is Universal Consciousness. The Supreme Consciousness is Omnipresent. Its evolutionary powers pervade the entire Universe. All processes of Nature are governed by the laws of this Absolute Force."
— Shriram Sharma

Consciousness is the state of being aware, either of something external or internal. In sentient beings, it is the concomitant of thoughts, feelings and sensations. The word “consciousness” is ordinarily associated with common waking consciousness. But the latter is only one type of consciousness. The difficulty in defining what really is consciousness has long been recognized by the early pioneers of psychology, such as William James and Sigmund Freud.

William James wrote in his Varieties of Religious Experience:

"Our normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different. We may go through life without suspecting their existence; but apply the requisite stimulus, and at a touch they are there in all their completeness, definite types of mentality which probably somewhere have their field of application and adaptation. No account of the universe in its totality can be final which leaves these other forms of consciousness quite disregarded. How to regard them is the question, for they are so discontinuous with ordinary consciousness."

Today, various modes of consciousness other than normal waking consciousness are recognized, such as dream state, dreamless sleep, hypnosis, hypnagogic state, drug-induced state, mystical states, enlightenment, intuition, and other forms of supramental states.

With the advent of behaviorism, consciousness took a back seat and its existence was even questioned. Behaviorism considers as valid only those which can be observed and measured. Hence such things as intentions, consciousness, thoughts, and similar subjective experiences were not given as much validity as observable behavior.

Eastern religions and philosophies distinguish between consciousness and vehicles of consciousness. Thus Purusa as pure consciousness perceives through Prakriti, or material essence. This is a view shared by Theosophical writers.

Thus, Madame Blavatsky wrote:

“While Consciousness is not a thing per se, Mind is distinctly — in its Manvantaric functions at least — an Entity.”
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - Collected Writings

In Theosophy, consciousness is derived from two primordial principles: the spiritual principle, and the material vehicles through which such a principle acts. They are equivalent to Parama-Purusa and Mulaprakriti.

The Mahatma Letters to Alfred Percy Sinnett states:

"The one and chief attribute of the universal spiritual principle — the unconscious but ever active life-giver — is to expand and shed; that of the universal material principle to gather in and fecundate. Unconscious and non-existing when separated, they become consciousness and life when brought together."
— The Mahatma Letters to Alfred Percy Sinnett

Thus, apart from Absolute Consciousness, which H. P. Blavatsky considers as unconsciousness, consciousness implies limitations and qualifications. It needs an object to be conscious of, and an entity to be conscious of the object.

Chidakasa is a Sanskrit term that means “space of consciousness” or “inner space.” In yoga philosophy, it is the link between the conscious, subconscious and super-conscious, located behind the forehead and the Ajna chakra. Chidakasa is where the activities of consciousness — both gross and subtle — take place.

Chidakasa in which all gross and subtle activities of the consciousness take place; it is the sky of consciousness, everything dies and evaporates in this space of consciousness, everything is reduced to its essence in this space. Even the mind (conditioned consciousness), along with intellect and ego, merges in this space of unconditioned Pure Consciousness through the paths of devotion, knowledge and action.

Yoga Vasistha speaks about the Bhutakasa – dealing with gross matter, Chittakasa – dealing with mental concepts and Chidakasa with the Ātman. These are spaces projected by the mind but all spaces are reduced to one, that is, to the ultimate space which is one’s own true self. Chittakasa is the field of the mind which provokes a deeper enquiry because there is in it still the duality of the 'seer' (drg) and the 'seen' (drshya); this duality ceases to exist in Chidakasa which is the field of Pure Consciousness viewed by the mind non-causally.

"As the one fire, after it has entered the world, though one, takes different forms according to whatever it burns, so does the internal Ātman of all beings, though one, takes a form according to whatever he enters and is outside all forms."
— Katha Upanishad II

"Prior to the manifestation of the cosmos, the primordial state of consciousness is called Chidakasa, consciousness in Akasa or primordial space. Its emergence is in seven degrees. The first is coeval with the first and second unmanifested Logoi. At this stage it is still latent. Then when manifestation or differentiation occurs, the latent consciousness becomes Mahat, or Cosmic Ideation."
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - Collected Writings

As Mahat is the primordial essence or principle of cosmic consciousness and intelligence, it is the fountain of the seven Prakritis — the seven planes or elements of the universe — and the guiding intelligence of manifested nature on all planes. Going deeper, we have pre-cosmic ideation, which is an aspect of that metaphysical triad which is the root from which proceeds all manifestation.

In the Vishnu-Purana, Brahma, for purposes of world formation, assumes four bodies — dawn, night, day, and evening twilight. Man is said to come from the body of dawn, for dawn signifies light, the intelligence of the intellect of the universe often called Mahat, the ultimate progenitor, and indeed the final cosmic goal, of the Hierarchy of Light of which the human hierarchy is a small portion.

Mahabuddhi from Mahā great + Buddhi consciousness, spiritual soul. Great Buddhi or consciousness; synonym of Mahat (cosmic mind or intelligence). Mahat from the verbal root mah to be great, the great; cosmic mind or intelligence, the basis and fundamental cause of the intelligent operations in and of nature considered as an organism. In Brahmanical philosophy, Mahat is the father-mother of Manas.

Madame Blavatsky called it the first product of Pradhana, the first-born of the Logos, universal mind limited by Manvantaric duration, the cosmic noumenon of matter, the one impersonal architect of the universe, the great Manvantaric principle of intelligence, the Third Logos, and the divine mind in active operation.

In Sankhya philosophy, it corresponds to kosmic Buddhi or Mahabuddhi and is called the first of the seven Prakritis or productive creation, the other six being Ahamkara and the five Tanmatras. When a ray from Mahat expresses itself as the human Manas (or even as the Manasic attribute of the finite gods), it then because of surrounding Maya involves the quality of egoity or Aham-ship. Thus it is said that the great Tree of Life has Parabrahman as its seed, Mahat as its trunk, and Ahamkara as its spreading branches.

Chidakasa also means the space of consciousness and the space behind the forehead which is the seat of visualization that links man with the conscious, subconscious and super-conscious and also the object of meditation or Ishta Deva; it helps gain insight into the connection between the two confronting worlds – the higher that is beyond all objects and thought and the lower which is the material world of senses. Subtle vision is developed through practice of Chidakasa Dharana.

Bhutakasa is the space outside, the outside world of objects that the senses meet and a mere reflection of the infinite within; Chidakasa is the space within which having turned the mind inwardly the sublime objectless infinite is to be realized through Adhyatma Vidya. In his Vivekachudamani, Shankara reminds that the first means to yoga is control of speech, then cessation of sense organ activity, control of mind and control of intellect.

Shankara states:

"If the mental functions are established in the true, unchanging, Higher Self, Brahman, this awareness of the phenomenal world is not experienced. What remains thereafter is merely a matter of meaningless word."
— Shloka 399

Then all wrong identifications and knowledge of the anatman cease to survive, there is complete removal of sorrow, and all that remains is the Infinite.

Yama tells Nachiketa:

"The Immortal Self (Ātman) is the sun shining in the sky, he is the breeze blowing in space, he is the fire burning on the altar, he is the guest dwelling in the house; he is in all men, he is in the gods, he is in the ether, he is wherever there is truth; he is the fish that is born in waters, he is the plant that grows in the soil, he is the river that gushes from the mountain, he is the changeless reality, the illimitable."
— Katha Upanishad II

What follows are the manifestations of consciousness in the lower planes of nature.

Consciousness in human and sentient beings results from the perceptive faculties awakened in the different levels or planes of nature. A stone has consciousness on its own level, but not of a kind that human beings are capable of.

"The special organ of consciousness in living people is the brain, located in the aura of the pineal gland. At variance with the common assumption that consciousness can only perceive one object at a time, she states that human consciousness can simultaneously receive no less than seven distinct impressions, and even pass them into memory.”
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - Collected Writings

“God the Supreme Musician offers his Music of Peace. Man the divine audience offers his peace-receptivity. God is the Supreme Musician. It is He who is playing with us, on us and in us. We cannot separate God from His Music. The universal Consciousness is constantly being played by the Supreme Himself, and is constantly growing into the Supreme Music. God the Creator is the Supreme Musician and God the creation is the supreme Music. The Musician and His Music can never be separated. His creation is being fulfilled. The Music Supreme feels its fulfilment only when it consciously becomes one with the Supreme, the Creator Himself. Through music, God is offering the message of unity in multiplicity and also the message of multiplicity in unity. Music is God's Dream. God is dreaming at every moment through music. His Dream is called the cosmic Reality, the universal Reality. From the highest point of view, music is not mere words; it is not a concept, not an idea. Music is Reality in its highest form. God is playing the supreme Music in and through us, His chosen instruments. He is playing on us in His own Way. He does not need any human instruments or words to convey His Message, to convey Himself. This He can do in silence without taking any help from the sound-world. God created sound in order to know outwardly what He is inwardly. Inwardly He knows what He is, but if He does not outwardly manifest His inner Divinity then the world cannot accept Him, cannot realize Him. So He created sound just for the sake of His own manifestation.”
— Sri Chinmoy

Re: Theosophy
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2024, 07:47:13 PM »
"The wheel of the Good Law moves swiftly on. It grinds by night and day. The worthless husks it drives from out the golden grain, the refuse from the flour. The hand of fate guides the wheel; the revolutions mark the beatings of the heart of manifestation."
― Helena Petrovna Blavatsky

As the Theosophist has no desire to play at being a squirrel upon its revolving wheel, he must refuse to follow the lead of the materialists. He, at any rate, knows that the revolutions of the physical world are, according to the ancient doctrine, attended by like revolutions in the world of intellect, for the spiritual evolution in the universe proceeds in cycles, like the physical one.

Do we not see in history a regular alternation of ebb and flow in the tide of human progress? Do we not see in history, and even find this within our own experience, that the great kingdoms of the world, after reaching the culmination of their greatness, descend again, in accordance with the same law by which they ascended? till, having reached the lowest point, humanity reasserts itself and mounts up once more, the height of its attainment being, by this law of ascending progression by cycles, somewhat higher than the point from which it had before descended.

Kingdoms and empires are under the same cyclic laws as planets, races, and everything else in Kosmos. The division of the history of mankind into what the Hindus call the Satya, Treta, Dvāpara and Kali Yugas, and what the Greeks referred to as “the Golden, Silver, Copper, and Iron Ages” is not a fiction. We see the same thing in the literature of peoples.

An age of great inspiration and unconscious productiveness is invariably followed by an age of criticism and consciousness. The one affords material for the analyzing and critical intellect of the other. The moment is more opportune than ever for the review of old philosophies. Archaeologists, philologists, astronomers, chemists and physicists are getting nearer and nearer to the point where they will be forced to consider them.

Physical science has already reached its limits of exploration; dogmatic theology sees the springs of its inspiration dry. The day is approaching when the world will receive the proofs that only ancient religions were in harmony with nature, and ancient science embraced all that can be known.

Secrets long kept may be revealed; books long forgotten and arts long time lost may be brought out to light again; papyri and parchments of inestimable importance will turn up in the hands of men who pretend to have unrolled them from mummies, or stumbled upon them in buried crypts; tablets and pillars, whose sculptured revelations will stagger theologians and confound scientists, may yet be excavated and interpreted. Who knows the possibilities of the future? An era of disenchantment and rebuilding will soon begin — nay, has already begun. The cycle has almost run its course; a new one is about to begin, and the future pages of history may contain full evidence, and convey full proof of the above.

Re: Theosophy
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2024, 07:51:09 PM »
"Truths cannot be acquired from words out of other people’s mouths. Before Truths can be internalized, they must come from one’s own realizations and practices. Through a lifetime of personal practice, human beings are capable of revealing all of the secrets of the cosmic essence. You are your own best judge."
— Gautama Buddha

That which is the Fundamental Truth, the Substantial Reality is beyond true naming but the Wise men call it The All.

"Truth is by nature self-evident. As soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear. The deepest spiritual truths are always unutterable. It has often occurred to me that a seeker after truth has to be silent."
— Mahatma Gandhi

Many people believe in God, and many people are atheistic; they do not believe in God. There are also many individuals who neither believe nor do not believe, and try to behave well in life just in case there is God.

We state that a belief in God does not indicate experience of the Truth, that which is called God. We state that to deny God does not indicate experience of That which is the Truth, that which is called God. We state that doubt of the existence of God does not indicate experience of the Truth. We need to experience That, which can transform us radically — That, which many call God, Allah, Tao, Zen, Brahman, INRI, etc.

The mind of believers is bottled in beliefs. To believe is not experience of that which is the Truth, God, Allah or whatever you want to call it. The mind of the atheist is bottled within incredulity, and is not the experience of the Truth, God, Brahman, etc. The mind of the one who doubts the existence of God is bottled in skepticism, and this is not the Truth. That which Is, that which is the Truth — God, Allah, or whatever we want to call That which does not have a name — is totally different from any belief, negation, or skepticism. While the mind remains bottled within anyone of these three factors of ignorance, it cannot experience That which the Chinese call the Tao, That which is Divine, That which is the Truth, God, Allah, Brahma, etc. Whosoever has experienced That which some call God, That which cannot be defined — because if it is defined it is disfigured — it is clear that he undergoes a radical, total, and definitive transformation.

When Pilate asked Jesus, “What is the truth?” Jesus kept silence. When the same question was asked to Buddha, he turned his back and walked away. The truth is incommunicable, as incommunicable is the sublime ecstasy that we feel when we contemplate a beautiful sunset. The truth is a matter of mystical experience, thus only by means of ecstasy can we experience it.

Everybody can give themselves the luxury of having an opinion about truth, but truth has nothing to do with opinions. Truth has nothing to do with thought; the truth is something that we can only experience while in the absence of “I.”

The truth comes to us like a thief in the night, when it is not expected. Indeed, the truth is something very paradoxical.

The truth is not something quiet and static; the truth is the unknowable, from moment to moment.

The truth is not a goal where we must arrive.

The truth is hidden within the depth of each problem of daily life.

The truth does not belong to time nor to eternity; the truth is beyond time and eternity.

The Truth — God, Allah, Brahman, or whatever you want to call That which is the great Reality — is a series of always expansive and successively more and more deeply significant experiences.

Some people have an idea about the truth, and other people have other ideas about it, thus everyone has their own ideas about the truth, but the truth has nothing to do with ideas. The truth is totally different from all ideas. Thus, in the world are many people who believe they have the truth, without ever in their life having experienced the truth. Commonly, those people want to teach the truth to those who indeed have once experienced it.

Without wise concentration on thought, the experience of the truth is impossible.

There are two types of concentration: the first is the exclusive type of concentration. The second is the total, complete type; it is non-exclusive.

True concentration is not the outcome of options, with all of its fights, nor is it the outcome of the choosing these or those thoughts: “that which I think,” that this thought is good and that one is bad, and vice versa; “that which I must not think” about this and that, “it is better to think about that,” etc. In fact, this forms conflicts between attention and distraction. Quietude and silence of the mind cannot exist where there are conflicts.

We must learn to wisely meditate, and as each thought, memory, image, idea, concept, etc., arises within the mind, we must watch it, study it, and extract what is of value from each thought, memory, image, etc.

When the parade of thoughts is exhausted, the mind remains quiet and in a profound silence. Then the Essence of the mind escapes, and the experience of That which is the Truth comes to us.

Our system of concentration excludes nothing; it is total, integral, complete. Our system of concentration includes everything and does not exclude anything. Our system of concentration is the way that leads us to the experience of the Truth.

"Truths cannot be acquired from words out of other people’s mouths. Before Truths can be internalized, they must come from one’s own realizations and practices. Through a lifetime of personal practice, human beings are capable of revealing all of the secrets of the cosmic essence. You are your own best judge."
— Gautama Buddha

Dharma धर्म is from Sanskrit and carries many meanings. It can be interpreted as law or truth. The word Dharma can be used to describe the way something works in its fundamental basis. Dharma is an essential truth, the essential nature of how phenomena occurs.

This is the root meaning that we are most interested in. It is the use of the word Dharma in relationship with truth, or how reality actually comes to be, is sustained, and is understood.

"Say not, I have found the truth, but rather, I have found a truth. Say not, I have found the path of the soul, Say rather, I have met the soul walking upon my path. For the soul walks upon all paths. The soul walks not upon a line, neither does it grow like a reed. The soul unfolds itself, like a lotus of countless petals."
— Kahlil Gibran

"If you want the truth, I'll tell you the truth. Listen to the secret sound, the real sound, which is inside you."
— Kabir

Re: Theosophy
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2024, 07:58:16 PM »
"The ascension is an allegory of the rebirth, resurrection, and union of the personality or ego with the inner god or Father in Heaven."
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - Collective Writings

Resurrection is rooted in the Latin word “resurgere” which means to resurge, remerge, to re-emerge.

“It is not more surprising to be born twice than once; everything in nature is resurrection.”
― Voltaire

The Mysteries of ancient times, and the rites connected with them, were very largely based on the secret and carefully hidden (occult) events which occurred to a person after death, so that the secrets of death, and the resurrection from death, formed a large part of the initiation ceremonies of the ancient Mysteries.

“Every soul is engaged in a great work — the labor of personal liberation from the state of ignorance. The world is a great prison; its bars are the Unknown. And each is a prisoner until, at last, he earns the right to tear these bars from their moldering sockets, and pass, illuminated and inspired into the darkness, which becomes lighted by that presence.”
― Manly P. Hall - The Secret of Hiram Abiff

Anastasis (Greek ανάσταση) meaning resurrection, or rising up; from (Ana) meaning up and (Stanai) meaning to make stand. It is related to the English word resuscitate, which means to raise, to revive, or to go up again, used in referring to the dead and to resurrection or rebirth. Resurrection which applies especially to  the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

However, this ancient mystical term was originally used for the rising of the initiant when, having completed the dread trials of initiation, he rose a new man, one who was reborn, or what in India was called a Dvija (twice-born), Son of the sun, etc., by being reborn from either the sun or the moon — both of them organs of Mother Nature. The idea of the twice-born was that the physical birth came from the human mother, while the mystic birth took place from the womb of nature, of which the initiation chamber was the emblem.

The rites significance belonging from earliest times to the cycle of initiation is that when a person through severe training, initiation, and a complete turning away from things of matter to things of spirit, had succeeded in becoming at one with his inner god at least on occasions, he was then considered to have arisen or to have become resurrected out of all the lower ranges of kosmic life, and to have attained self-conscious existence in the spirit. Having attained anastasis, he took his place in the hierarchy of light or compassion as one of the colaborers with the gods.

The old Hermetic axiom exclaimed:

"As above, so below; as below, so above."

This Principle is of universal application and manifestation, on the various planes of the material, mental, and spiritual planes.

Resurrection, or a rising again, implying a previous descent; a rebirth after death. In its widest sense, the universal law of cyclic renewal manifested in cosmic, solar, terrestrial, and human phenomena, applying to Manvantaras, and to reawakenings of the earth and of man — whether humanity as a whole, races, or individuals.

In the last case it means regeneration, the second birth, initiation, symbolized by the resurrection of the mystic Christ enacted in the Mysteries, when the candidate rose from that cruciform couch which he had undergone the experiences of death.

In Christianity this has become an actual physical or bodily resurrection of Jesus, supported by the stories of the empty tomb and the appearances to the disciples. The dogma of the resurrection of the body, however, is pointedly related to the teaching of the migration of the life-atoms, whereby the reincarnating entity draws together the elements which it had previously discarded.

There is an Arabic legend of the bone Luz, said to be one of the bones at the bottom of the spinal column, the Os Coccygis, as indestructible and forming the nucleus of the resurrection body. In the adytum or Holy of Holies of ancient temples was found a sarcophagus symbolizing the universal process of resurrection, but in degenerate times it was occasionally turned by ignorance into a symbol of physical procreation. Other emblems of resurrection are the frog, phoenix, and egg.

All the great ancient initiations comprised a purification or preparation (katharsis), a trance followed by a dying, and a later resurrection of the initiant or neophyte as a fully born initiate, adept, or new man. Like the Phoenix, man resurrected out of his old, born anew.

"The ascension is an allegory of the rebirth, resurrection, and union of the personality or ego with the inner god or Father in Heaven."
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - Collective Writings

The Kerkes or Phoenix, "the bird of resurrection in Eternity . . . in whom night follows the day, and day the night — an allusion to the periodical cycles of cosmic resurrection and human re-incarnation.”
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume I

“The Kerkes and the Onech stand for a race cycle, and the mystical tree Ababel — the "Father Tree" in the Koran — shoots out new branches and vegetation at every resurrection of the Kerkes or Phoenix; the "Day of judgment" meaning a "minor Pralaya." The author of the "Book of God" and the "Apocalypse" believes that "the Phoenix is very plainly the same as the Simorgh, the Persian Roc, and the account which is given us of this last bird, yet more decisively establishes the opinion that the death and revival of the Phoenix exhibit the successive destruction and reproduction of the world, which many believed to be effected by the agency of a fiery deluge."
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume II

The Arabic Roc is a giant bird, appearing in the Arabian Nights’; equivalent to the Arabian ’Anka or Phoenix, the Hindu Garuda, and the Persian Simorgh.

The Egyptian Bennu is a bird of the heron species, identified with the Phoenix. It was prominent in Egyptian mythology, being associated with the sun. It was said to have come into being from the fire which burned at the top of the sacred Persea Tree; that the renewed morning sun rose in the form of the Bennu; and that it was the soul of Ra, the sun god.

The sanctuary of the Bennu was likewise that of Ra and of Osiris.

A hymn in the Book of the Dead says:

“I go in like the Hawk, and I come forth like the Bennu, the Morning Star."

"The bird of resurrection in Eternity . . . in whom night follows the day, and day the night — an allusion to the periodical cycles of cosmic resurrection and human reincarnation.”
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume I

The connection with the Phoenix is purely mystical, because just as the Phoenix is said to be reborn from its own ashes, thus bringing about a new cycle, so the neophyte during initiation is said to be reborn from the “ashes” of his past self.

"On the day of resurrection both Muhammadans and Christians will see the vanity of their religious doctrines. Men fight about religion on earth — in heaven they shall find out that there is only one true religion — the worship of God's Spirit."
— Professor Max Muller

Re: Theosophy
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2024, 08:02:01 PM »
Moses was a Hebrew prophet, teacher and leader according to Abrahamic tradition. He is considered the most important prophet in Judaism and Samaritanism, and one of the most important prophets in Christianity, Islam, the Baháʼí Faith, and other Abrahamic religions. According to both the Bible and the Quran, Moses was the leader of the Israelites and lawgiver to whom the prophetic authorship of the Torah (the first five books of the Bible) is attributed.

We are told by Moses that the Israelites carried away the sacred vessels of the Egyptians when they came out of the land of bondage. The account is allegorical, for the great prophet would scarcely have encouraged his people in an act of theft; the sacred vessels in question were the mysteries of Egyptian knowledge, acquired by Moses himself at the court of Pharaoh. The Bible tells us that Jannes and Jambres, Pharaoh's magicians, at first performed "the same miracles" as Moses, and that they declared those which they could not imitate, impossible to human science.

The sufferings of the Chosen People in Egypt and their miraculous exodus out of it belong to the celestial allegory of the solar drama that was performed in the mysteries of the divine nether-world, and had been performed as a mythical representation ages before it was converted into a history of the Jews by the literalizers of the ancient legends. But, of all the various versions of the coming forth or exodus from out of the under-world, not one has caused such deep perplexity as this of Israel issuing from Egypt, in which the mythos has been misappropriated and converted into an ethnical history.

The exodus from the nether-earth, or Lower Egypt, is the same as in the Hebrew and other versions of the mythos, the original of which is provably Egyptian. The double-earth is the same as in the Ritual. Consequently the vine is the tree of dawn up which the sun and souls ascended from the Tuat by means of the tree. The Egyptian Exodus is a mystery of Amenta. It is described in the Ritual of “coming forth to day” from “the Hades of Egypt and the desert.”

Tuat was divided into twelve regions, called fields (Sekhet), or the Greek fields of Elysium, corresponding to the number of hours of the night; or again it was described as being composed of seven circles (Arrets), each under the guardianship of a watcher. Tuat was known as Amenti (Egyptian Amentet) “the hidden place”, a term often applied to the whole region of the dead.

“The visible that was, and the invisible that is, rested in eternal non-being — the one being.”
— Book of Dzyan (1:7) from The Secret Doctrine

The mystical and mythologic teachings concerning Amenti were all more-or-less symbolic descriptions of the series of after-death states and adventures experienced by the excarnate entity. Thus Kama-Loka, Devachan, and the postmortem peregrinations of the excarnate Monad are all combined under the one term - Amenti.

Thus the origin of the exodus, as Egyptian, was in the coming forth of the heavenly bodies from below the horizon in the mythical representation. In other words, this was the Kamite exodus of the manes from Amenta in the eschatological phase of the mythos, which has been converted by literalization into the “history” found in the book of Exodus. The Hebrew märchen are the legendary remains of the Egyptian mythos, whether in the book of Genesis or the book of Exodus. The “coming forth to day” with which the Ritual opens is the Egyptian exodus, and the Hebrew exodus is likewise the coming forth to day.

This is not to say that the books of Genesis, Exodus, and Joshua are intentional forgeries, but that the data were already more or less extant as subject-matter of the mysteries, and that an exoteric version of the ancient wisdom has been rendered in the form of historic narrative and ethnically applied to the Palestinian Jews. Various legends derived from the Egyptian mythology were compounded in the Hebrew book of Exodus. In certain of the extra-biblical features of the Mosaic mythos the lower Egypt of Amenta is plainly indicated as the real land of the exodus.

The descriptions of Mount Sinai in the book of Exodus show that it was the mount of glory in the solar mythos — that is, the mount of sunrise in the daily course, and the mount of the equinox as the horizon of the annual sun. Various meanings of the word Sheni coincide in showing that the typical Mount Sinai, Sin, or Ba-Shen was the Mount Sheni in the Egyptian astronomical mythology. We have to remember that as far back as the time of the first dynasty Egypt included the mount and surrounding region of Sinai as a part of the double kingdom.

The biography of Moses, the story of his birth, childhood and rescue from the Nile by Pharaoh's daughter, is now shown to have been adapted from the Chaldean narrative about Sargon. For the glyph of Pharaoh's daughter (the woman), the Nile (the Great Deep and Water), and the baby-boy found floating therein in the ark of rushes, has not been primarily composed for, or by, Moses. It has been found anticipated in the Babylonian fragments on the tiles, in the story of King Sargon, who lived far earlier than Moses.

Zipporah is similar to the City Sippara — situated on the Euphrates River north of Babylon — where the casting of the infant Sargon occurred, which is practically identical with the story of Moses, only said to have happened about 1100 years earlier.

H.P. Blavatsky says in The Secret Doctrine:

"The Akkadians were not Turonian, but were emigrants from India and were the Aryan instructors of the later Babylonians. There is an Akkadian Genesis, which stands in the line of descent leading to the Biblical Genesis. The beginning of Exodus, and the story of Moses is that of the Babylonian Sargon, who having flourished around 3750 B.C. preceded the Jewish lawgiver by almost 2300 years. Nevertheless, Genesis is an undeniably esoteric work. It has not borrowed, nor has it disfigured the universal symbols and teachings on the lines of which it was written, but simply adapted the eternal truths to its own national spirit and clothed them in cunning allegories comprehensible only to its Kabbalists and Initiates.”
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume II

The ethnology of the ancient peoples inhabiting Mesopotamia is extremely obscure. The records of occult history show that in a previous geological period, all that portion of western and central-western Asia, which includes Persia, Babylonia, Turkestan, Baluchistan, Afghanistan, etc., was once a highly fertile and well-populated portion of the earth’s surface, not only bearing once famous and brilliant civilizations, but likewise the seat of different peoples living side by side.

When immense climatic and geological changes took place, this vast stretch of territory became the seeding-place or focus whence spread to the east, south, and west various emigrant offshoots which populated what were then less fertile territories, which in time became on the one hand northern India, Afghanistan, Baluchistan, and Turkestan, and on the southwest Iran, Mesopotamia, Asia Minor, and the Caucasus district.

It was far later that a reverse current of emigration left what is now northern India and proceeded westward settling to a certain extent in the lands of their ancient forefathers, and this accounts not only for the similarities between the west and east of this district, but the Indian influence perceptible in Mesopotamia and the close linguistic and other links that existed between the ancient Zoroastrians and the Brahmanical streams of thought.

The only Pharaoh whom the Bible shows going down into the Red Sea was the king who pursued the Israelites, and who remained unnamed, for very good reasons, perhaps. The story surely derived from the Atlantean legend.

The exodus was the coming forth of the Manes from “Egypt and the desert” as localities in the mysteries of Amenta. This was then made geographical and practical by literalization in that exodus of the Israelites from the land of the Pharaohs which has hitherto passed as biblical history.

Moses is the water-born. Josephus explains the name as signifying one who was taken out of the water. Pharaoh’s daughter called the name of the child Mosheh, and said: “because I drew him out of the water.” (Exodus 2:10)

"The ‘well’ by which Moses sat down in his flight from the Pharaoh symbolizes the ‘well of Knowledge.”
― Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume II

“The flowing (a river) — with a collateral idea of descent from a higher place, in which lies its mystical significance. Many Christian hymns speak of the mystical Jordan and of reaching the ‘shore beyond,’ a conception which appears to be more or less identic with that of Buddhism. ‘This side’ is the life of the world, the usual or common pursuits of men. The ‘other shore’ is simply the life spiritual, involving the expansion in relatively full power and function of the entire range of man’s nature. In other words, to reach the ‘other shore’ means living at one with the divinity within, and hence partaking of the universal life in relatively full self-consciousness.”
― Fountain-Source of Occultism by G. de Purucker

“With this fish, with the waters in general, and, for the Christians, with the Jordan waters in particular, the whole program of the ancient Mystery-Initiation is connected. The whole of the New Testament is an allegorical representation of the Cycle of Initiation, i.e., the natural birth of man in sin or flesh, and of his second or spiritual birth as an Initiate followed by his resurrection after three days of trance — a mode of purification — during which time his human body or Astral was in Hades or Hell, which is the earth, and his divine Ego in Heaven or the realm of truth.”
― Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - Collective Writings

The following parallel will briefly indicate how directly the Mosaic commandments given on Mount Sanai were borrowed from the wisdom of Egypt:

Egyptian: “I have not blasphemed a god.”

Hebrew: “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”

Egyptian: “I have not committed adultery.”

Hebrew: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”

Egyptian: “I have not committed theft.”

Hebrew: “Thou shalt not steal.”

Egyptian: “I have not borne false witness (or told lies) in the tribunal of truth.”

Hebrew: “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

Egyptian: “I am not a murderer.”

Hebrew: “Thou shalt do no murder.”

The 42 laws of Maat (truth) were an essential part in the mystery rites for initiation into the higher mysteries.

This is reminiscent of the three days allotted to the initiation experience, and also of the fact that fish is a mystery-term embodying the idea of an advanced adept whose consciousness swims in the ether of space.

“The initiated adept, who had successfully passed through all the trials, was attached, not nailed, but simply tied on a couch in the form of a tau (in Egypt) of a Swastika without the four additional prolongations (thus, not) plunged in a deep sleep (the ‘Sleep of Siloam’ it is called to this day among the Initiates in Asia Minor, in Syria, and even higher Egypt). He was allowed to remain in this state for three days and three nights, during which time his Spiritual Ego was said to confabulate with the ‘gods,’ descend into Hades, Amenti, or Patala (according to the country), and do works of charity to the invisible beings, whether souls of men or Elemental Spirits; his body remaining all the time in a temple crypt or subterranean cave. In Egypt it was placed in the Sarcophagus in the King’s Chamber of the Pyramid of Cheops, and carried during the night of the approaching third day to the entrance of a gallery, where at a certain hour the beams of the rising Sun struck full on the face of the entranced candidate, who awoke to be initiated by Osiris, and Thoth the God of Wisdom.”
— Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - The Secret Doctrine - Volume II