Biden Minneapolis dindu riots

[Tootsie]

SUM MUTHAFUKA BETTA WASH DA DISHES SHREK IS DEAD SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIT!

CALM DOWN..

[Asuka Langley]

[Asuka Langley]

They just cant stop committing crimes

[WOTR]

They just cant stop committing crimes

That is certainly one way to lower the gun violence in your city.

"Since the beginning of 2021, Fremont has experienced a sharp increase in gun violence. In response several units within the Department recently established a gun violence reduction team. "

[Master Trollda]

Trying to shoot the dog was he?

[Master Trollda]

[AZZERAE]

"The media creates the mob and the mob rules."

That may be so, but this chick is totally over compensating.

How can anyone find Chauvin innocent?

#SpinZone

[Master Trollda]

That may be so, but this chick is totally over compensating.

How can anyone find Chauvin innocent?

#SpinZone

Because he is. Floyd was a career criminal who was resisting arrest and on a combination of meth and fentanyl at the time. When you take a combination of speed and opiates it plays havok with your heart and is a good way to kill yourself. It’s called speedballing and it’s how John Belushi died.

How do you find him guilty? Cuz racism?

[Master Trollda]

[Bugsby Crackleford]

Apparently South African protesters have threaten to invade the US embassy over Lindani Myeni shooting

A protest was held outside the US Embassy demanding justice for Lindani Myeni. Protesters demand his body to be repatriated to South Africa and a full thorough investigation into his death to be held. 

[WOTR]

Because he is. Floyd was a career criminal who was resisting arrest and on a combination of meth and fentanyl at the time.

I find it interesting to bring up a dead man's past as a justification of why it is alright he is dead. Did the police run his record and decide that it is justified to kill him based on his past crimes? Yes- he resisted arrest, and then spent 9 minutes on the ground in cuffs and was a danger to nobody for those 9 minutes. That time was about power and control for the officer. Lessons I suspect he will quickly learn in prison.

No, he was not St. Floyd. Yes, the world is probably a better place without him. But there was no need for the amount of force used. I neither love nor loath the police. But I don't believe a sane person could watch the video and conclude that the outcome was justified. Once somebody is in restraints they are no longer a threat to your life or anybody else's. The knife wielding lady was a different story. The individuals pulling a gun on the cop are a different story. This was a man in cuffs with lots of police muscle around.

Again, I don't want to give the impression that I care for Floyd at all. But I also cannot say that I would not have turned in a guilty verdict based on what information I gleaned (I did not spend days watching the trial.)

[pate]

I am still struggling with the distinction between "Social Justice" and regular "Justice."

I don't pay attention to this stuff, honestly, but I did hear on the radio today (I think it was a weekend re-cap thing about last week's events) that this George Floyd dude got convicted of 1st and 2nd degree Murder and something called 3rd Degree Manslaughter?  How many people's necks did he stand on anyway?



I have no idea if that clip is relevant other than it is about hockey, which is where the "Stand on his NECK!" thing comes from.  I like to yell "STAND ON HIS NECK" when there is a hockey fight, don't judge me.

[WOTR]

I am still struggling with the distinction between "Social Justice" and regular "Justice."

I don't pay attention to this stuff, honestly, but I did hear on the radio today (I think it was a weekend re-cap thing about last week's events) that this George Floyd dude got convicted of 1st and 2nd degree Murder and something called 3rd Degree Manslaughter?  How many people's necks did he stand on anyway?

I watched it live, and was wondering the same thing. How many times can you be convicted of the same crime? One dead guy, three convictions. I mean, if you are guilty of first degree murder, then you are probably also guilty of second degree murder and manslaughter (and probably assault, and assault with a weapon, and indignity to a body, and a hundred other charges.)

[Master Trollda]

I find it interesting to bring up a dead man's past as a justification of why it is alright he is dead. Did the police run his record and decide that it is justified to kill him based on his past crimes? Yes- he resisted arrest, and then spent 9 minutes on the ground in cuffs and was a danger to nobody for those 9 minutes. That time was about power and control for the officer. Lessons I suspect he will quickly learn in prison.

No, he was not St. Floyd. Yes, the world is probably a better place without him. But there was no need for the amount of force used. I neither love nor loath the police. But I don't believe a sane person could watch the video and conclude that the outcome was justified. Once somebody is in restraints they are no longer a threat to your life or anybody else's. The knife wielding lady was a different story. The individuals pulling a gun on the cop are a different story. This was a man in cuffs with lots of police muscle around.

Again, I don't want to give the impression that I care for Floyd at all. But I also cannot say that I would not have turned in a guilty verdict based on what information I gleaned (I did not spend days watching the trial.)

Whoa, trigger! I never said it was justification for killing him. My point was that Chauvin didn’t kill him. At the time he was on a combination of speed and opiates and trying to drive a car. The combination of the drugs in his body and the stress he was under caused his death. I’m sure the doctors who did the autopsy were pressured if not physically threatened to “make the right call or else” given the political climate today. I’m just saying his past speaks to his character and that character was not good.

Here’s something else to consider: Have you ever been in a sleeper choke hold? I have a few times because of some training I used to do. If you have you know that what happens is your blood supply is cut off to your brain and you start to blackout. That didn’t happen to George Floyd. He was yapping and moaning and groaning for most of that time until he stopped. And he stopped because he had a heart attack because of the drugs and stress. If Chauvin was applying that much pressure to his neck he would’ve blacked out long before that. The whole thing is bullshit propaganda.

[pate]

...How can anyone find Chauvin innocent?..

It depends on what the charge is.

1st Degree Murder is pre-planned and fully intended:  I wake up, say to myself, "Today, Dr. MD MD dies" I board a plane, visit his hometown and execute him.

2nd Degree Murder is in the heat of the moment, but still intentional:  Dr. MD MD and I are at the 15-year BellGab reunion, he makes a pass at Roz and I get enraged and kill him by throwing him Out the sliding-glass In door, and pee on him while he exsanguinates in front of horrified hotel car-porters.

Manslaughter is due to my negligence and not paying attention:  I am in conversation with Chefist and demonstrating how to properly "saber" a Champagne bottle at the 30-year BellGab reunion;  Dr. MD MD happens to be standing behind me seekrut-lee admiring my manly physique as I backstroke in perpetration of decapitating the Champagne bottle and inadvertently render him headless.

Wrongful Death is due to negligence:  I construct and manufacture a Device that can be used to access the Intar-Tubes to post endless Goo-Tube Vidyas, but due to my lax safety testing this device delivers a deadly electrocution shock hazard on every other Tucker Carlson video that the end user posts.  Dr. MD MD dies from a horrific electrocution within minutes of using the device.  (That this is after only 19.5 postings of Tucker Carlson videos, is miraculous:  but I am still liable)