Lazar,
Curious that you wish to ascribe a positive outcome in the affair to Trump. No doubt, he will take credit for anything he sees as politically advantageous to his reputation in his normal amusing way. You seem to credit him, perhaps erroneously, with some sort of positive agency
vis à vis the Albertan Independence movement & the potential outcome.
I wonder if an examination of a sort of negative agency as a preposition to the possible outcome might serve you better? Perhaps, if the blame is to be laid at the feet of any idealogical idol's altar; we could say that the
failure of
the Clinton/Obama/COMINTERN the hobo elite economic policy might be a
far better target for your political ire? After all, Canada's economic problems clearly pre-date any notional Trumpian Monarchy,
n'est-ce pas?
I would say that Eastern Canada's socialist largesse towards Albertan (Western Canada's) wealth into their own impoverished pockets over the years might be the primary agent driving the current political phenomenon we are witnessing,
c'est pas vrai?
-------------
Doc,
buddy, in case you have trouble with the above text, you might enjoy the following vidya:
I am suspicious that it might be AI slop, so hard to tell these days. If so, it's a damn good one, very natural sounding voice... even has sub-titles (you don't have to read them, they are an accurate rendition of the spoken word).
ediot: to add 'far' for emphasis
