Author Topic: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.  (Read 674464 times)

Re: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.
« Reply #195 on: April 29, 2021, 06:18:39 PM »
Jones seems to be moving away from living fossils!

Jones and Chen


Oh lawd Lauren Chen went on infowars? I would go watch it on youtube but.... yeah

Re: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.
« Reply #196 on: April 29, 2021, 06:27:13 PM »
Alex is starting to look vaguely Asian

Re: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.
« Reply #197 on: April 30, 2021, 01:00:37 AM »



Re: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.
« Reply #198 on: April 30, 2021, 11:55:12 PM »
Thought I that the cake was a lie but it turns out it’s shampoo. The name should have been a dead giveaway.


Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #199 on: May 02, 2021, 01:08:20 AM »
I saw a picture of something called a "mankini" posted on GLP the other day.  Not the Borat style double strapper but rather a wrap around singleton.  It hugged the scrotum tightly and wraps around. The question is what the hell anchors it? From an Engineering perspective, everything I can come up with is an abomination. 

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #200 on: May 02, 2021, 01:17:36 AM »
I saw a picture of something called a "mankini" posted on GLP the other day.  Not the Borat style double strapper but rather a wrap around singleton.  It hugged the scrotum tightly and wraps around. The question is what the hell anchors it? From an Engineering perspective, everything I can come up with is an abomination.

Stretchy, between the legs and over one shoulder, like what I have seen?  The tension alone would (mostly) keep it on, I would think, but you would have to mind your posture or I have a hunch the natural line between shoulder and taint would not always lend itself to modesty.  I will experiment with some exercise bands I have laying around and report on my findings.

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #201 on: May 02, 2021, 01:20:30 AM »
Stretchy, between the legs and over one shoulder, like what I have seen?  The tension alone would (mostly) keep it on, I would think, but you would have to mind your posture or I have a hunch the natural line between shoulder and taint would not always lend itself to modesty.  I will experiment with some exercise bands I have laying around and report on my findings.

No shoulder involved.  Just looped from the nutsack, around the hip and into the abyss.   I'd post a picture but......  Well. It's not appropriate.

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #202 on: May 02, 2021, 01:23:11 AM »
No shoulder involved.  Just looped from the nutsack, around the hip and into the abyss.   I'd post a picture but......  Well. It's not appropriate.

https://www.shinesty.com/collections/guys-boxers

Heh heh...Ball Hamock.

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #203 on: May 02, 2021, 01:24:25 AM »

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #204 on: May 02, 2021, 01:33:47 AM »
No shoulder involved.  Just looped from the nutsack, around the hip and into the abyss.   I'd post a picture but......  Well. It's not appropriate.

Oh THOSE hahaha well if you can imagine tying a string snug around your hip joint, forcing it over one buttcheek and then shoving your junk underneath it in a little baggie, that's more or less the principle.  Of course these parts must be discrete and not melded into one amorphous mass of blubber for it to work, i. e. you need a waist, a butt, and minimal fupa.

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #205 on: May 02, 2021, 01:36:51 AM »
Oh THOSE hahaha well if you can imagine tying a string snug around your hip joint, forcing it over one buttcheek and then shoving your junk underneath it in a little baggie, that's more or less the principle.  Of course these parts must be discrete and not melded into one amorphous mass of blubber for it to work, i. e. you need a waist, a butt, and minimal fupa.

Ok. Basically a nard tourniquet around one leg. Whew. The other possibility was some sort of rectal anchor point.   

Re: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.
« Reply #206 on: May 02, 2021, 01:39:33 AM »
Coincidentally I was being offered ads for the brokini yesterday, that seems to be the new thing.  Though I am sure circus strongmen used to parade around in leopard-print versions in the middle of the last century.


Re: Arbitrary, idiotic things on your mind. Post 'em.
« Reply #207 on: May 02, 2021, 01:41:14 AM »
^^^ A nice classic look. 

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #208 on: May 02, 2021, 01:43:02 AM »
Ok. Basically a nard tourniquet around one leg. Whew. The other possibility was some sort of rectal anchor point.

There are some designs that have you shove your business end through a hole into the little baggie (aka a sock) at which point straps and ties are superfluous and you just can't bend over.

Re: Fashion question for K_Dubb
« Reply #209 on: May 02, 2021, 03:42:48 AM »
There are some designs that have you shove your business end through a hole into the little baggie (aka a sock) at which point straps and ties are superfluous and you just can't bend over.

Is this really a thing that is worn in public? I can see wearing it at the "resorts" in Palm Springs. But outside of that, I cannot image them to be popular beach wear or something to wear to the water parks to go down a slide (albeit, some of the slides can cause stand issue swimwear to resemble the described garment.)