According to
many credible sources, under the Bush era, a couple years after the September 11th attack on the World Trade Centre, the US Army and the CIA detained criminals of various severity, and supposed
leaders of an insurrection against said American occupational forces in Iraq.
What followed were leaked photographs of torture both of a sexual and non-sexual nature. The violence enacted on the prisoners was proven to have violated the human rights of the detainees, and resulted in war crimes explicitly flying in the face of Geneva Conventions.
While I'm
certain that a key few individuals subjected to the sodomy, execution and torment
were indeed not boy scouts, in my view, the acts perpetrated against these people exceeded what was
necessary - and having been
done in order to attain information that would damn the islamic and non-islamic extremists - was a poor, poor excuse for what came to light.
Many aspects of this piece of recent history turn my stomach. And have gotten me thinking -
how were these abuses excused, and almost
none of the military officials charged for engaging in this behaviour?
How is
any of this
that far removed from what Nazi Germany did?
I'm sure everyone has come across the photographs some time in the past of the smiling, seemingly elated guards giving a "thumbs up" next to dead bodies, perched atop
human pyramids, and documenting prisoners with human faeces smeared over their faces, having urine-soaked underwear pulled over their mouth and nose, being chained to bars in incredibly uncomfortable positions for days, taunted by vicious dogs, or even being
electrocuted by makeshift shocking devices, with bags on their heads.
I don't even wanna link the photos here, but I will make
one exception, and share with you a picture of a woman with a sadistic grin on her face next to a dead, seemingly frozen cadaver:

The pic above is not even the
worst of it, and we all
know that.
Can anybody explain to me how such a freedom-loving country can get away with such things? Please, help me
understand if I'm
missing something.
No other country in the world could get away with this (well, maybe North Korea - and Trump's buddy-buddy relationship with Kim Jong-Un
still confuses me), so, who THE FUCK thought it'd be a
good idea to take snapshots of this barbarity?
While I can't
begin to imagine
how angry flying planes into a prominent building made the American public - along with all the innocent life lost - can there
really be any
credible excuse for the behaviour at Abu Gharib?
And
who got charged?