Roz, check this out:
Say, did you manage to find any Satsumas? It should be peak harvest season right now.
------
I made a few loaves of whole wheat bread the other day that turned out okay (no pics sorry) and last night I was playing around with my Jiffy Clone Cornbread recipe.

Which I have
absolutely dialed in for my 8.5" cast iron, but not yet for the 12" one. I did some math that indicated that the 12" was roughly double the 8.5" in volume which seemed counter-intuitive. I went ahead and did it anyway (
even though I suspected it was wrong).
It is difficult to say for sure, as my digital scale decided to turn itself off right in the middle of weighing out the buttermilk. <---
Sounds like it wouldn't be a big deal, just turn it on and re-weigh you say?---> Well, that is true, but I decided to put the full jug of buttermilk on the scale (
sans cap) and zero the scale. Then pour the buttermilk into the batter and reweigh until the scale reached a value of -288g.
The scale I used has a range of 2g to ~5lbs(
?whatever that is in grams?) and if you exceed that weight it displays a weight of "Err"<--(
which should have ellipses following, I digress) ... and then turns itself off in shame.
Apparently, a full half gallon of buttermilk exceeds ~5lbs and the "
Err...or" occurred when I added roughly 135g of buttermilk (
I didna pay attention, gah). I had to switch to the emergency "
Eyeball Mk-II" back-up scale for the remainder.
This was all for the best, it turned out that my calculated batch was not nearly as voluminous as I had hoped. The finished cornbread barely rose to fill half of the 12" cast-iron, doubling of the recipe is indicated.
It did have a pretty nice crown though; I estimate the peak of which was at about 2/3 the height of the cast-iron: the proportions are solid.
I was also testing to see if the omission of sugar in my Jiffy Clone recipe affected final product/crumb etc (
if, for instance, one wants something suitable for Cornbread Stuffing): It does not.
Though the final product was half as much as expected, it managed to nicely fill a 1/2 sheet pan when crumbled. That was my aim in the first place (
which might be the proximate/ultimate cause of the volume maths error: Nautical Shore).
--------
I do not know if Candy falls within the scope of this thread.
If so, I am happy to report that the "Caramel Mk-I" feasibility test resulted in an edible product, although I suspect that the meat thermometer I used should be replaced with an actual candy thermometer. 338F was my temperature benchmark, and I think that is at the upper end of my meat thermometer's range, which typically can throw accuracy off (
you want to measure temperature in the middle of a thermometer's range ideally).
It didn't quite burn, although there was some smokiness present and when the Caramel cooled to room temperature; it was dangerously close to "hard crack" stage but retained flexibility.
I would not eat this product if you have crowns on your teeth: it has surface adhesion properties close to dental glue...
I will shoot for a ~330F benchmark temperature next time and perhaps buy an actual digital Candy Thermometer.
I also established that Heavy Whipping Cream will work for making Caramel, although I do not how that will affect shelf stability: this may require some sort of environmental control as I intend to coat the final "Caramel Mk-XYZ" recipe in Milk Chocolate.
The Mk-I batch would be great for decorative work though:

I think mine would have been a bit darker brown if I had done that.
Good Thymes!
